I really wanted to use, and like, a 135mm f2 lens so I bought the Canon version. (purchased for $1,100), reviewed October 5th, 2008 I loved the Nikon 80-400G for a year, or so, and then found everything with it wrong, and got rid of it. Weight. In fact, in my test shots, I noticed that the red channel was a little softer than green and blue. image quality wise it is by far one the sharpest lenses ive ever used. if you really want to get the best gym photos that can be taken, use it and enjoy what you will see. This is actually worse than just plain obsession with blur. Try to have eyes and nose / lips all in focus.
Best Canon Lens for Astrophotography [Top 8 Reviewed] I read and bought it. From the moment I reviewed the first sub-exposure on the display screen of my camera, I feel in love with the mid-range magnification of a 135mm lens. this lens typifies modern design being confined to sharpness, colour & bokeh. Sure, if you scroll through his page there are quite a few lens tests on starshttps://www.flickr.chotos/ytoropin/, Community Forum Software by IP.BoardLicensed to: Cloudy Nights, Article: The Best Telephoto Lenses for Astrophotography, This is not recommended for shared computers, Review of Explore Scientific First Light 8, COUNTING SUNSPOTS WITH A $10 OPTICAL TUBE ASSEMBLY, Hubble Optics 14 inch Dobsonian - Part 2: The SiTech GoTo system, iStar Opticals Phantom FCL 140-6.5 review. Also type the lens you are interested in into the search window on Astrobin to see examples shot with that lens. Hi Thomas As far as I know, the Nikon D500 is not modified for astrophotography out of the box (it includes a built in IR cut filter that blocks much of the 656nm wavelength). A tiny bit of fringing, but that would only be noticed by pixel-peepers. We sell a wide variety of digital cameras from all the top brands like Canon, Nikon, Sony, Panasonic, Olympus, Fujifilm, Pentax, Leica, Samsung, and more. Its fast f/2.0 maximum aperture is effective in low light and enables shallow depth of field control. Definetely the most sharpest lens which I have ever seen. Over the years, I have tried more than two dozen telephoto lenses, until I finally found three or four perfect solutions. I almost bought one, but couldn't manage that focal length and DoF with moving subjects and manual focus. Ive been using kit lenses for the past year, favoring the Nikkor 50mm 2.8. Otherwise, on FF body this lens is wonderful. Several days ago another member posted a stunning telephoto image of the Snake Nebula, Barnard 72, taken with a Canon lens which costs $12,000. I love this lens, The Sharpest Lens available for Eos cameras IMO Some people like these, and consider them decorative. But you are talking more than 2x crop (cut half by width and height) and that leaves you to twice smaller resolution == quarter of the Mpix count.So now your 42Mpix A7rII is only a 10.5Mpix. Star parties or dark sky excursions are another great time to use a camera lens in place of the telescope. Lenses with extreme sharpness and bokeh tend to be heavy. The main problem with the old lenses is spherical aberration and colour error, especially pronounced on digital sensors. you can see here a lot of photos mostly shot with the f/4 version. p.s. I have found myself shooting wide open almost all the time. If you want to preview the image field you can expect with a particular camera sensor and lens combination, Stellarium features a useful tool. Excellent build quality, fast auto focus, and its fast. That whole rig comes to about $1200, minus the mount. That's why I really enjoy shooting portraits with it. Please ride off on the same horse you rode in on. (purchased for $860), reviewed March 9th, 2017 I have a Nikon d 500. The lens came in a handsome box, with core specifications and a lens construction diagram printed on the side. I would recommend buying it used if you want to save some money, with the added benefit that you can re-sell it at the same price as you bought it for, effectively giving you the opportunity to "rent it" for free. Again, there's no context. So whats so great about shooting at 135mm anyway? No rear seals - since the 17-40 Canon has added rear seals to L lenses, to help in weather sealing.
canon 135mm f2 astrophotography - fullpackcanva.com Yeah I agree that the sentiment that they were designed to be used stopped down is wrong as they were designed to be used wide open because they had to be for speed (my point above). Same thing as people mistake "shallow DOF" to blurry background. The Best Telephoto Lenses for Astrophotography. Of course, when it comes to astrophotography, this can create some challenges as well. How good this lens overall and how sharp and color-free? Stuff I used to take the photos in this video:- The Canon 135mm f2 lens: https://amzn.to/346Paz7- Sony A7III Camera: https://amzn.to/2xM776q- Sony Grip exten. The spec sheet for the Rokinon 135mm F/2 boasts a number of qualities, with the ones listed below being the most important when it comes to night photography and astro. Great reach for street shots. 85 Is a different story, my 85 gets used a lot. Some people do not like this and consider Bokeh to refer only to the rendering of out of focus points of light. Rokinon FE14M-C Lens. Love the shot of the blue anemone, which also displays nice bokeh, and blur! It also focuses really fast and accurate and is light. Perfect lens on the same level as CZ! Thanks.. Recently, the FAA announced that recreational drone pilots in the USA can request LAANC authorization to fly in controlled airspace at night. I use the word design, because although the available 135mm F2 lenses aren't the exact same optical formula, they share many important traits. So I feel I'm being cheated. If you shoot things in motion on a Canon body, and need some reach without massive bulk, this is the one I recommend. I'm enjoying the Sigma Art 135mm - it's notably sharper than the Canon (which I owned at the same time), and it's f/1.8 instead of f/2. Yes, each can produce different results (And that's why I keep and use several different lenses), but my point is that sharpness or bokeh are not the only factors for portraits -- sometimes it just comes down to convenience or price! It is good to know that the 200/4 SMC Takumar is good. I have used the canon 70-200 f2.8L ii and also the 100-400 f4.5/5.6 L with excellent results. And because you can shoot between F/2 and F/4, plenty of light reaches the sensor in a relatively short exposure. The one and only 300mm lens I tested is the Zeiss Tele-Tessar 300mm F4. Thats quite a jump from 135mm, so the camera body you use with this lens may change the types of targets you shoot. Literally it means "blur" so you could just as well use the dictionary definition below the top match from Google search: Bokeh - the visual quality of the out-of-focus areas of a photographic image, especially as rendered by a particular lens. Rokinon 135mm F2.0 ED Lens. The model I use feels solid and the barrel is constructed with metal. Yes, she's isolated.
Samyang 135mm f/2.0 ED UMC Telephoto Lens for Canon EF Digital SLR Cameras I do not think telephoto lenses would be suitable for use with your modified camera. The Rokinon 135mm F/2.0 ED UMC lens is a fantastic companion for the Canon 60Da, as it offers a useful "mid-range" focal length for a variety of deep-sky projects. I cant wait to try this lens out during the winter months on some wide-field targets in Orion. Also, we ought never question or diminish the joy of others. I put quotes around the ones that are written on the lens. The full name of this lens is the Rokinon 135mm F/2 ED UMC, with "ED" standing for extra-low dispersion, and UMC referring to the "ultra multi-coated" optics. I use it to photograph highschool basketball in poor light. My work requires auto-focus. He has quite a breadth photos many of which are quite good. It's small, light, cheap and extremely wide but is it any good? You can't really ask them to stand still while you move around. Perhaps I missed it, but did you use a clip-in light pollution filter with your 60D and this lens? Now I have only the Nikon but I can try to take a photo of the same subject fully open If you have the 1.8 version, way to go. Images that sing. (purchased for $900), reviewed November 2nd, 2015 reviewed August 2nd, 2017 My Nikon focus and aperture rings are a thing of highly finessed engineering beauty! Mr Ericsson makes a very good point, and to go and dig irrelevant background info on him to discredit him is just well THAT is trolling. The 135mm Rokinon with the Canon Rebel seems like a pretty good setup. The Canon is about as sharp as the Samyang, but it has some very slight chromatic aberration. The APO showed no chromatic aberration at all with the addition of the Astronomik UV/IR cut clip filter (passing 380-680nm), but the telephoto lenses, even when stopped down, showed a tight bright red ring around all stars. I also find the other photos not very good. Chris referred to the Canon RF 16mm F2.8 STM as 'a little gem'! Also, when shooting the heart nebula, is the sky tracker a must or not required? Asahi Optical's Pentax KX was one of the first cameras with this lens mount, acting as a midrange model in the lineup. So.. its like there is one F stop not being used by the lens..how do you know what click is for what F stop?? .
Rokinon 135mm F2.0 ED UMC Telephoto Lens for Canon Digital SLR Cameras The 135 L handles this well. @juksu - you're such a hypocrite. Here is a recent ones taken with the canon xs and a lens. Zoom lenses are entirely unsuitable for astrophotography due to prominent aberrations of every kind. This makes me feel I shall take the Zeiss 85F1.8 off my A6000 or maybe NOT, it's just another hype article about "A" lens. Oh and it's stabilised. When all that was available were APS-C crop cameras a 85mm lens provided a near equivalent view angle to the 135mm on a full frame camera. Off topic, Several functions may not work. You won't get the excessive background blurr -- which for the beginning photographer may actually be a good thing. Exterem apertures are extrems (wether it's full open or closed) that should be reserved for extrem cases. The 135mm f2.8 in particular can take amazing photos of the brighter deep sky objects with about 1 second time . Its a no brainer if you use this focal length. The shallow depth of field present at its maximum aperture does indeed create a pleasing bokeh. I shoot it wide open 90% of the time. Everyone assumes their definition is the "true" one. I got this lens because of portraiture. Include the Carl Zeiss in your research though, it might be an interesting lens for you, even if it is a bit pricey for what you get. I think youll find that this lens is behind some of the most amazing wide-field astrophotography images online! The Nikon D810A, however, is modified for astrophotography out of the box. I will say that at F/4 this lens is extremely sharp corner to corner when used on my 60Da. I have been following your work both on YT and here from Japan for a while. Does this work well with any of the 1.4x / 1.7x / 2.0x Teleconverters (extenders / barlows)? Andysea, those are great images on your website. When coupled with my Canon DSLR camera, the entire system weighs just over 3 pounds. After a three-year hiatus, we've been at the return of the CP+ camera show in Yokohama, Japan. Pleiades (M45) Orion Nebula (M42) Carina Nebula (shown below) North American Nebula; Heart and Soul Nebula (IC 1805 / IC 1848) Some real life images from my photoblog: http://hellabella.de, One of the best and sharpest lens around. I was blown away when I loaded the photos into my computer. Flip on through what we found, and see how the lens performs in the real world in our sample gallery. I heard it's very sharp and well corrected. MCovington, my Zeiss 300/4 is the full thickness barrel version, made in West Germany, serial number 5990836. Last time I used a 135mm f2 was decades ago on a Canon F1. For portraits and with a high MP body I'd be more inclined than ever to just go 85mm, and for other uses it's hard to pass up the zooms' versatility, but I still there's still room for 135s in some kits and some formats. I would be careful with the Nikon 135 f/2 DC (I have one). But like a glitch in the matrix, an anomaly that shouldn't exist, you can get the Samyang/Rokinon 135mm for as little as $430 brand new. This is a stunning lens, clearly one of the very best lenses that Canon produces, this is in the same world class as the 35 1.4, 85 1.2 L lenses. Will I be able to capture the heart nebula with the lens youre talking about or would I need to modify my camera as well? Great question Scott I think it depends on the image. Thanks for sharing your thoughts.No disagreement here. It's March, and in America that means it's time to start arguing over which college athletics team is the best at basketball. It turns out that this. This lens provides all of these requirements. Seems like a great lens. Which is the better buy? Overall, spectacular lens. The only downside with that lens is that it is manual focus, which might not be suitable for photographing sports or children. Such "full spectrum" cameras are somewhat more sensitive in the ultraviolet, but much more sensitive in the deep red and infrared. The version I have has the mount for Canon EOS camera bodies, but there are several different lens mounts available on Amazon. With an effective focal length of roughly 216mm when coupled with a Canon crop sensor body, the field of view is nearly identical to the one youd find on a full-frame camera with a 200mm telephoto lens. At the other end of the aperture range though, the 5D's larger pixels actually help matters, as the softening starts later (it's very sharp even at f/16), and is noticeably lower at f/32. If 135mm f2 works for you, then fine.
Orion's Belt : r/astrophotography - reddit.com lol, nice images, and i nearly bought this lens myself a few years ago. It starts out very sharp at f/2.0, gets even sharper at f/2.8, and softens only slightly at f/11. Stick to Andromeda, and skip the Whirlpool. Ironically all the sample images in this post are painfully soft. The 70-200 f2.8 L2 and he 400f5.6 will however set you back way more than $1.100. This way the focus will favor the red light which is more objectionable within a star image than a bit of blue. Canon 60Da DSLR and Canon 70-200mm f/2.8 L2 lens at 135mm, f/3.2. (AVX). OK guysTOS rule number one "Posts that are not respectful of other individuals (be they members or not) are not welcome here.". Zeiss Jena or Oberkochen? One of the prime examples of such a design is the "nifty fifty"the 50mm F1.8 lens construction that many lens manufacturers provide. And now important part: This lens can be stopped down if desired effect is not required and no, with 85/1.8 you will never get this effect. AF ring feels loose compared to my other L lenses. I had one question that i cant seem to find an answer to.. 21P Giacobini Zinner NGC1499 California Barnard 8 Cr399 Coathanger North America and Pelican Veil nebula HORGB M11 cluster area But she might as well be in front of a green screen.
Canon EF 135mm f/2 L USM lens. How good it is? - Cloudy Nights The downsides of this configuration are that shooting wide open can make focusing difficult. And in their task to get that blurry background, they most often throw their main subject out of focus and/or to focus for anything else in the photograph that would make it, and end results are just "gear porn". Canon EOS 60Da with the Rokinon 135mm F/2 lens. Canon CR-N700 4K PTZ Camera with 15x Zoom. USM works so quickly and accurately, it puts my 24-70/f2.8L to shame. The first example is good to show that you can take photos of persons in front of an ugly background without completely ruining the shot (important for people shooting events), the last one is the only one I really like (because of the color) but you could shoot this with any lens with short MFD. When I was on my way home after purchasing my first 135mm lens (the Samyang/Rokinon one) I took a few quick snapshots just to try out the lens. (37% is difference, so you get little more, about 15.5Mpix). They seem to be really good for NB work. It's terrible. The best of them, Nikon's 70-200E, is just as sharp all but the very best primes - ie, already too sharp for most portrait work. Focus are dead on with my Fullframe or APS system. The 135 is lighter, but that's its only advantage. (And cost less too). Everyone should have one? The flat lens hood is great for taking flat frames after a night of astrophotography. in the rain. Now we have to read this kind of ignorant misinformation on DPR articles. Please re-enable javascript to access full functionality. The interest of a f/1.4 is to be able to be perfect at f/2.8, while a f/1.8 or f/2 might need to be on f/4 to have the same sharpeness and overall IQ.They are not meant to be used wide open, except in rare moments. What I am trying to avoid is spending another $1,100 on a quality APO, and instead using my existing Nikkor 180mm ED lens with a Baader-modified Canon 450D that I just obtained. I just purchased a very lightly used Canon 200mm F2.8L II USM for $620 from a great online dealer and can't wait for an opportunity to try it out with my Astronomik CLS clip on a T4i at a dark site. Rokinon 135mm F/2 Lens for ASTROPHOTOGRAPHY. Interesting. In this buying guide we've rounded-up several great cameras for shooting sports and action, and recommended the best. Second of all, the incredible sharpness of the photo: I have owned many lenses, most of which I bought because they were supposed to have world-class sharpness, but the Samyang 135mm still stands out to me. Oh yes, and it leads to lusting after other primes! Canon 135mm is a great lens. In this new review, I focus exclusively on the unprecedented Samyang 135mm f/2, which is primarily designed for portrait and wildlife. Although if Bokeh and sharpness is your thing and you can live with MF the Laowa 105mm f/2 Smooth Trans Focus (STF) is amazing. How about the sigma 50mm f1.4 Art? There's just nothing there. Whos Afraid of a Phantom: Istar Phantom 140mm F/6.5, that is? It's not the most versatile lens, but it's very great for tight portrait shoots; background blur is creamy IMO; one of the best 'bokeh' lens. For posed portraiture, it's a very nice budget option.FWIW, I'm a corporate portrait and event pro. Besides, adding IS would mean adding extra elements and that would very likely reduce the image quality. I really like how they augment my longer focal length scopes. The 135L is half the weight of the 70-200 2.8IS. The lenses I selected are all affordable prime lenses, easily available on the second-hand market, and adaptable to the EOS system. But If you want the "look" you get with a medium telephoto at f/2, hen all those negatives become irrelevant. Bottom line, this is just an outstanding lens by any measure, one that makes clear why you'd want to pay the freight for expensive prime glass. - posted in Beginning Deep Sky Imaging: I have recently received my star adventurer and as of now only have the star adventurer, benro tripod (super stable), and a unmodded canon t2i with only a 18-55mm lens. Will this ever get old? Never before (nor after) have I seen a lens with this level of sharpness wide open. (purchased for $970), reviewed March 17th, 2011 It is a parade of photos that should have been galled out after a boring Sunday afternoon shoot of "Think I'll bring along a camera when I walk the dog", There are so many things wrong in this 'review' -- most of all the idea that 'you' should get this lens and somehow it magically makes the duck or the cat stuck right in the center of picture a great photo! And as this article clearly shows, no amount of blurr will make a poorly composed photo good. It is fantastically sharp, can make beautiful blurred backgrounds and bokeh, and is both light and inexpensive for what you get.
My first photo of the night sky is of Comet NEOWISE, however I know its not the best photo I could capture. But you are talking more than 2x crop (cut half by width and height) and that leaves you to twice smaller resolution == quarter of the Mpix count. My point is that we must never lose the joy of photography. I know taste is subjective, but it seems to me that some people have become obsessed with blur and bokeh. We have come to accept that most lenses are strong in only one or two of these three factors, that I personally focus on when researching lenses to buy. All content, design, and layout are Copyright 19982023 Digital Photography Review All Rights Reserved. fast, sharp wide open, excellent bokeh, value for money, very fast, sharp, gorgeous background blur, world class lens. I have a vintage Nikon135mm f/2.8 AI-s which produces virtually the same bokeh and weighs a quarter of this or any other 135mm AF lens. If experience has taught me anything, its that the practical, pain-free equipment that gets the most use under the stars. At around $900 US very good price for quality no IS. Here are our top picks for the canon lenses for astrophotography.
Digital Cameras & Digital Camera Kits | Camera Gear | B&H Fast continuous shooting, reliable autofocus and great battery life are just three of the most important factors. 2. here are some links to some pics taken with the lens: Really excels as indoor sports lens on a crop camera. Sony has added a full-frame 50mm F1.4 prime to its premium 'GM' range of E-mount lenses. You got a criticism fine say it politely, and too the point. thanks for the write-up.. i just got this lens and have just been trying it out. If you have pictures taken using the Rokinon 135mm F/2 lens, please feel free to share your results in the comments section (links to Astrobin, Flickr or your personal gallery are fine). A specialist lens, at best, though I did enjoy the cat image. I was very happy for this reason to eventually get a full frame DSLR in 2007 and sell the 85mm lens and buy a 105mm one to replace it. Film Friday: DPRTV reviews Fujifilm's Acros II film, Fujifilm launches Instax Mini 12 instant camera, DPReview March Madness, vote for your champions, Canon RF 16mm F2.8 STM sample gallery (DPReview TV), OM System M. Zuiko 90mm F3.5 Macro sample gallery, Live from Japan: Highlights from CP+ 2023, Retro Review: 24 years later, the Sony F505 is still pretty cool, Hands on with the OM System M. Zuiko 90mm F3.5 Macro, New FAA rules make it easier for recreational drone pilots to fly in restricted US airspaces, Leica marks James Bond's 60th* with a special edition D-Lux 7, Film Friday: A closer look at the Pentax KX, an original K-mount SLR, Blackmagic Design announces a new Studio Camera 6K Pro, National Geographic selects Pictures of the Year photo contest winner, Sigma brings DC DN APS-C primes to Nikon Z-mount, Panasonic Lumix S 14-28mm F4-5.6 Macro sample gallery, Tamron announces 11-20mm F2.8 ultra-wide zoom for Fujifilm X-mount, Film Friday: DPReview TV steps back in time to shoot APS film, Finer Points: Here's an easy way to improve video autofocus, DPReview TV: One simple fix to improve video autofocus, Head-to-head: Adobe Super Resolution vs. ON1 Resize AI vs. Topaz Labs Gigapixel AI, Waiting for the fishy in the little dishy by Gil Aegerter, Lava Lizard on Marine Iguana by ZimmWisdom.
City Of Springfield Ma Health Benefits,
Does Murdoch Have A Child,
Ceausescu Last Speech Transcript,
Grace Jones Twin Brother,
Articles C